For the 1L treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma

A dual I-O delivering durable
and superior efficacy*
for 1L mMel patients1,2

   

   

*Based on the 13.2-month median final analysis, the primary endpoint of PFS was statistically significant; mPFS was 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.4–15.7) with Opdualag vs 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.4–5.6) with nivolumab (HR=0.75§; 95% CI: 0.62–0.92; P=0.0055).1,3 At the median follow-up of 19.3 months, the final analysis for the secondary endpoint of OS was not statistically significant (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.64–1.01; P=0.0593); threshold for significance was P<0.04302.1,4 ORR could not be formally tested based on testing hierarchy and was descriptively analyzed for Opdualag (43%; 95% CI: 38–48) vs nivolumab (33%; 95% CI: 28–38).1,2,4

Assessed by BICR.1 Kaplan-Meier estimate.1 §Based on stratified Cox proportional hazards model.1

1L=first-line; BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; I-O=immuno-oncology; LAG-3=lymphocyte-activation gene 3; mMel=metastatic melanoma; mPFS=median progression-free survival; ORR=overall response rate; OS=overall survival; PD-1=programmed cell death protein-1; PFS=progression-free survival.

More than 2x mPFS  Opdualag vs Nivolumab

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®)

First-line, NCCN Category 1 Preferred

Nivolumab and Relatlimab-rmbw (Opdualag®) is recommended as an NCCN Category 1, preferred first-line treatment option for unresectable or metastatic melanoma, regardless of BRAF status5

  • Among preferred regimens, combination checkpoint blockade is preferred over anti–PD-1 monotherapy5*
  • BRAF/MEK combination therapy is recommended as a Category 1, other recommended first-line therapy5†

*Combination immune checkpoint blockade is associated with improved response rate, PFS, and OS compared with anti–PD-1 monotherapy. Considerations for using combination therapy vs monotherapy include: patient’s desire for potentially improved efficacy and willingness to take on a higher risk of toxicity; absence of comorbidities or autoimmune processes that would elevate the risk of irAEs; tumor burden and patient social support and preparedness to work with medical team to handle toxicities. High-volume symptomatic disease BRAF+ patients may benefit from BRAF/MEK inhibition, as opposed to combination immunotherapy. Otherwise, nivolumab + ipilimumab is preferred first-line over BRAF/MEK therapy due to OS benefit.Category 1: Based upon high-level evidence (≥1 randomized phase 3 trials or high-quality, robust meta-analyses), there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate; Preferred intervention: Interventions that are based on superior efficacy, safety, and evidence, and when appropriate, affordability; Other recommended intervention: Other interventions that may be somewhat less efficacious, more toxic, or based on less mature data; or significantly less affordable for similar outcomes.4

BRAF=B-Raf proto-oncogene; irAE=immune-related adverse events; MEK=mitogen-activated protein kinase; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®);

NEW

Chart icon
Efficacy Data

Explore the 4-year data from the
clinical trial.

Magnifying glass icon
Safety Data

Find information about adverse reactions seen in the clinical trial.

Dosing schedule icon
Dosing Schedule

Learn more about the dosing schedule for this fixed-dose combination therapy.

References:

  1. Opdualag [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
  2. Lipson EJ, Hodi S, Tawbi H, et al. Nivolumab plus relatlimab in advanced melanoma: RELATIVITY-047 4-year update. Eur J Cancer. 2025:225:115547.
  3. Tawbi HA, Schadendorf D, Lipson EJ, et al. Relatlimab and nivolumab versus nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(1):24-34.
  4. Long GV, Hodi FS, Lipson EF, et al. Relatlimab and nivolumab vs nivolumab in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: overall survival and response rates from RELATIVITY-047 (CA224-047). Oral background at ASCO Plenary Series 2022.
  5. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Melanoma: Cutaneous V.2.2025. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2025. All rights reserved. Accessed April 11, 2025. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.


1425-US-2500032 07/25

© 2025 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. OPDUALAG®, OPDIVO®, YERVOY®, and the related logos are trademarks of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

This website is intended for U.S. Healthcare Professionals.

Legal Notice     Privacy Policy     Your Privacy Choices     Site Map