For the 1L treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma
Optimize 1L Dual I-O:
Opdualag for Durable and
Superior Efficacy1,2*
For the 1L treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma
Optimize 1L Dual I-O:
Opdualag for Durable and
Superior Efficacy1,2*
*Based on the 13.2-month median final analysis, the primary endpoint of PFS was statistically significant; mPFS† was 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.4–15.7) with Opdualag vs 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.4–5.6) with nivolumab‡ (HR=0.75§; 95% CI: 0.62–0.92; P=0.0055). At the median follow-up of 19.3 months, the final analysis for the secondary endpoint of OS was not statistically significant (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.64–1.01; P=0.0593); threshold for significance was P<0.04302. ORR could not be formally tested based on testing hierarchy and was descriptively analyzed for Opdualag (43%; 95% CI: 38–48) vs nivolumab (33%; 95% CI: 28–38).1,3,4 †Assessed by BICR.1 ‡Kaplan-Meier estimate.1,2 §Based on stratified Cox proportional hazards model.1
OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
*Considerations for using combination therapy versus monotherapy include: patient’s desire for potentially improved efficacy and willingness to take on a higher risk of toxicity; absence of comorbidities or autoimmune processes that would elevate the risk of irAEs; tumor burden, patient social support, and preparedness to work with a medical team to handle toxicities.5 †High-volume symptomatic disease BRAF+ patients may benefit from BRAF/MEK inhibition, as opposed to combination immunotherapy. Otherwise, nivolumab + ipilimumab is preferred first-line over BRAF/MEK therapy.5 Category 1: Based upon high-level evidence (≥1 randomized phase 3 trials or high-quality, robust meta-analyses), there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.5 Preferred intervention: Interventions that are based on superior efficacy, safety, and evidence; and, when appropriate, affordability.5 Other recommended intervention: Other interventions that may be somewhat less efficacious, more toxic, or based on less mature data; or significantly less affordable for similar outcomes.5
NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.
Explore the 4-year data from the
clinical trial.
Find information about adverse reactions seen in the clinical trial.
Learn more about the dosing schedule for this fixed-dose combination therapy.
1L=first-line; BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR=hazard ratio; I-O=immuno-oncology; irAE=immune-related adverse events; MEK=mitogen-activated protein kinase; mMel=metastatic melanoma; mPFS=median progression-free survival; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ORR=overall response rate; OS=overall survival; PD-1=programmed death receptor-1; PFS=progression-free survival; WT=wild type.
References: