No additional safety events and
similar rates of most common
Grade 3/4 adverse reactions vs
nivolumab monotherapy1,2
Actor portrayal.
Adverse reactions occurring in ≥15% of patients in the Opdualag™ (nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw) or nivolumab monotherapy arm1
ADVERSE REACTION* |
OPDUALAG (n=355) |
NIVOLUMAB (n=359) |
OPDUALAG (n=355) |
NIVOLUMAB (n=359) |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALL GRADES (%) |
ALL GRADES (%) |
GRADES 3-4 (%) |
GRADES 3-4 (%) |
|
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Musculoskeletal pain† |
45 |
31 |
4.2 |
1.7 |
General Fatigue† |
39 |
29 |
2 | 0.6 |
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Rash† Pruritus |
28 25 |
21 17 |
1.4 0 |
1.9 0.6 |
Gastrointestinal Diarrhea† Nausea |
24 17 |
17 14 |
2 0.6 |
1.4 0 |
Nervous System Headache† |
18 |
12 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Endocrine Hypothyroidism† |
17 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders Decreased appetite |
15 |
7 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders Cough† |
15 |
11 |
0.3 |
0 |
- Grade 3/4 increases greater than 1% vs nivolumab monotherapy were fatigue (1.4%) and musculoskeletal pain (2.5%)1
- Treatment-related discontinuation rates were 14.6% with Opdualag vs 6.7% with nivolumab3
- Grade 1/2 discontinuation rate was 5.8% with Opdualag vs 3.6% with nivolumab
- Grade 3/4 discontinuation rate was 8.5% with Opdualag vs 3.1% with nivolumab
- With 33.8-month median follow-up, there were no new or unexpected safety events observed with the combination of nivolumab plus relatlimab. The safety profile of nivolumab plus relatlimab remains consistent and in line with the analyses previously presented and included within the Opdualag Prescribing Information4
Toxicity was graded per NCI CTCAE v5.
*Clinically relevant adverse reactions in <15% of patients who received Opdualag included vitiligo, adrenal insufficiency, myocarditis, and hepatitis.1 †Includes multiple terms.1
NCI CTCAE=National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Similar rates of Grade 3/4 IMARs across treatment arms and no additional safety events1,3
Increases seen in Grade 3/4 IMARs with Opdualag vs nivolumab were hepatitis (2.8%), adrenal insufficiency (1.4%), and myocarditis (0.6%)3
IMAR | OPDUALAG (n=355) | NIVOLUMAB (n=359) | OPDUALAG (n=355) | NIVOLUMAB (n=359) |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALL GRADES (%) | ALL GRADES (%) | GRADES 3-4 (%) | GRADES 3-4 (%) | |
Hypothyroidism | 59 (16.6) | 47 (13.1) | 0 | 0 |
Thyroiditis | 10 (2.8) | 5 (1.4) | 0 | 0 |
Rash | 33 (9.3) | 24 (6.7) | 2 (0.6) | 5 (1.4) |
Diarrhea/colitis | 24 (6.8) | 11 (3.1) | 4 (1.1) | 5 (1.4) |
Hyperthyroidism | 22 (6.2) | 24 (6.7) | 0 | 0 |
Hepatitis | 20 (5.6) | 9 (2.5) | 14 (3.9) | 4 (1.1) |
Adrenal insufficiency | 15 (4.2) | 3 (0.8) | 5 (1.4) | 0 |
Pneumonitis | 13 (3.7) | 6 (1.7) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) |
Hypophysitis | 9 (2.5) | 3 (0.8) | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) |
Nephritis and renal dysfunction | 7 (2) |
5 (1.4) | 4 (1.1) | 4 (1.1) |
Infusion-related reactions | 4 (1) | 4 (1.1) | 0 | 0 |
Type 1 diabetes, which can present with diabetic ketoacidosis |
1 (0.3) |
2 (0.6) |
1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) |
Myocarditis | 6 (1.7) |
2 (0.6) |
2 (0.6) |
0 |
IMAR=immune-mediated adverse reaction.
Similar median time to onset of IMARs across treatment arms1,3
IMAR time to onset (range in months)
Standard management of IMARs
Similar rate of permanent discontinuations, treatment interruptions, and resolution rates vs nivolumab monotherapy1,3
Adverse |
Opdualag |
Nivolumab |
Opdualag |
Nivolumab |
Opdualag |
Nivolumab |
Opdualag |
Nivolumab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanent |
Dose Delay or |
Systemic |
Resolution Rate (%) |
|||||
Pneumonitis |
0.8 |
0.6 |
2.5 |
1.1 |
100 (13/13) |
100 (6/6) |
85% of 13 |
50% of 6 |
Diarrhea/colitis |
2 |
0.8 |
4.2 |
1.9 |
100 (24/24) |
100 (11/11) |
83% of 24 |
64% of 11 |
Hepatitis |
1.7 |
1.1 |
3.9 |
1.7 |
100 (20/20) |
100 (9/9) |
70% of 20 |
100% of 9 |
Nephritis with renal dysfunction |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
100 (7/7) |
100 (5/5) |
71% of 7 |
80% of 5 |
Rash |
0 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
1.7 |
100 (33/33) |
100 (24/24) |
70% of 33 |
63% of 24 |
Hypersensitivity/ infusion-related reaction | 0 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
100 (4/4) |
100 (4/4) |
100% of 4 |
100% of 4 |
Adrenal insufficiency |
1.1 |
0 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
87 (13/15) |
100 (3/3) |
33% of 15 |
33% of 3 |
Hypophysitis |
0.3 |
0 |
0.8 |
0 |
100 (9/9) |
100 (3/3) |
22% of 9 |
67% of 3 |
Hypothyroidism |
0.3 |
0 |
2.5 |
1.7 |
0 |
0 |
12% of 59 |
13% of 47 |
Thyroiditis |
0 |
0 |
0.3 |
0 |
20 (2/10) |
20 (1/5) |
90% of 10 |
100% of 5 |
Hyperthyroidism |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
1.4 |
23 (5/22) |
8 (2/24) |
82% of 22 |
79% of 24 |
Type 1 diabetes, which can present with diabetic ketoacidosis |
0 |
0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
100 (1/1) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Myocarditis |
1.7 |
0.3 |
0 |
0.6 |
100 (6/6) |
100 (2/2) |
100% of 6 |
50% of 2 |
NEW
Efficacy Data
Explore the 33.8-month median follow-up data from the clinical trial.
Dosing Schedule
Learn more about the dosing schedule for this fixed-dose combination therapy.
Treatment Modifications
Find information about treatment modifications and IMAR management.
References:
- Opdualag [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
- Tawbi HA, Schadendorf D, Lipson EJ, et al. Relatlimab and nivolumab versus nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(1):24-34.
- Data on file. BMS-REF-Nivo+Rela-0006. Princeton, NJ. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2023.
- Data on file. BMS-REF-Nivo+Rela-0014. Princeton, NJ. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2024.